Saturday, July 25, 2009
July 25: Trading or Transfering?
This question brings an interesting twist to what we could consider for the major sports here in the US. As a matter of fact, I have been thinking about this for some time, beginning when I started paying attention to the Premier League intently. This happens to coincide with finding out about fantasy soccer, but my fantasy addiction is left for another time and another entry.
In international soccer, players are not always traded outright from one team to another. Teams recognize that players will develop and their wages should increase. Therefore, teams will submit transfer figures to the opposing teams. This amount is to release the player from the contract they are currently under and let the paying team negotiate a new contract. Then the player can switch teams, and his team is left with a pile of money instead.
This was in the news recently as Cristiano Ronaldo moved from Manchester United to Real Madrid for almost $132 million. This outrageous amount is paid directly into the account of Manchester United, and they can use those funds to purchase their own players, or they can just hang on to it. Transactions like this occur across Europe, as big teams pluck new talent from the lower tiers, and the lower tiers retool lineups and rosters. Teams will even accept multiple bids, leaving the paying teams to out-negotiate with each other over the services of the player. Sometimes, if a team has no more use for a player, or just desires for him to leave, they will let them go on free, or without the other team having to pay any money at all.
This was a novel idea when I first read about it, and piqued my interest even more as I got into the nuts and bolts. There are many different variations that can occur. Sometimes, teams will not only include money, but players may switch hands as well. For instance, a team may switch strikers, with one paying $5 million more to make the deal happen. Other times, a team is more interested in the rights to the player than the player himself. This could be as a future investment for the club or for transfer money. They will purchase him with a loan agreement back to the original team. This means the player will play for his original team, but is owned by another squad. Loans are also very common, as teams will not need a player and not want to pay the salary, but will not want to lose the benefits of a big money transfer deal down the line.
How can this play out in the MLB, NBA, NFL, or NHL? I am not exactly sure, but I think it would be an interesting tweak. For instance, the Cowboys would not have to eat Terrell Owens salary towards the cap if they had agreed with Buffalo to move Owens on a free transfer, with Buffalo renegotiating a contract with him. Also, the Broncos could have shopped Cutler to a number of teams, getting players, cash, and/or draft picks back without having to be limited. And if picks weren't immediately necessary, get cash so they could turn around and try to pry Chad Pennington out of Miami. This would open up possibilities for teams to recoup on players they no longer needed while giving them the chance to avoid prospects flaming out.
In MLB, the ever-present traders could recoup cash to sink into future signing bonuses, development, scouting, or acquiring their own talent. Instead of trading Adam LaRoche for some guess prospects, they could get $3 million for him. This money could help resign Jack Wilson or Freddy Sanchez, it could go towards signing Scott Boras clients, or it could be used to improve the minor system already in place. The Althletics could get Brett Wallace at third, but then receive $5 million for the rest of Matt Holliday, only to turn around and send $3 million to the Dodgers for three prospects that the Dodgers are willing to part with.
And in the NBA, the trade amounts that must be relatively equal could be a thing of the past as teams pay not for expiring contracts, but for the chance to sign players now. The Knicks pay $35 million to the Cavs for the chance to sign LeBron now. Not to be outdone, the Nets also pony up the money, and a bidding war ensues. And the Bulls, desperate for a post presence, can agree with Utah to swap Boozer for Tyrus Thomas and $6 million which the Jazz put towards Milsap's contract.
This is not a sure thing. Teams in Europe make millions of dollars each year, but are still way over their heads in debt. And in the NBA and MLB, if we are to believe the reports, the money might not be there for the transfer system. But it would be pretty neat, though, wouldn't it?
In international soccer, players are not always traded outright from one team to another. Teams recognize that players will develop and their wages should increase. Therefore, teams will submit transfer figures to the opposing teams. This amount is to release the player from the contract they are currently under and let the paying team negotiate a new contract. Then the player can switch teams, and his team is left with a pile of money instead.
This was in the news recently as Cristiano Ronaldo moved from Manchester United to Real Madrid for almost $132 million. This outrageous amount is paid directly into the account of Manchester United, and they can use those funds to purchase their own players, or they can just hang on to it. Transactions like this occur across Europe, as big teams pluck new talent from the lower tiers, and the lower tiers retool lineups and rosters. Teams will even accept multiple bids, leaving the paying teams to out-negotiate with each other over the services of the player. Sometimes, if a team has no more use for a player, or just desires for him to leave, they will let them go on free, or without the other team having to pay any money at all.
This was a novel idea when I first read about it, and piqued my interest even more as I got into the nuts and bolts. There are many different variations that can occur. Sometimes, teams will not only include money, but players may switch hands as well. For instance, a team may switch strikers, with one paying $5 million more to make the deal happen. Other times, a team is more interested in the rights to the player than the player himself. This could be as a future investment for the club or for transfer money. They will purchase him with a loan agreement back to the original team. This means the player will play for his original team, but is owned by another squad. Loans are also very common, as teams will not need a player and not want to pay the salary, but will not want to lose the benefits of a big money transfer deal down the line.
How can this play out in the MLB, NBA, NFL, or NHL? I am not exactly sure, but I think it would be an interesting tweak. For instance, the Cowboys would not have to eat Terrell Owens salary towards the cap if they had agreed with Buffalo to move Owens on a free transfer, with Buffalo renegotiating a contract with him. Also, the Broncos could have shopped Cutler to a number of teams, getting players, cash, and/or draft picks back without having to be limited. And if picks weren't immediately necessary, get cash so they could turn around and try to pry Chad Pennington out of Miami. This would open up possibilities for teams to recoup on players they no longer needed while giving them the chance to avoid prospects flaming out.
In MLB, the ever-present traders could recoup cash to sink into future signing bonuses, development, scouting, or acquiring their own talent. Instead of trading Adam LaRoche for some guess prospects, they could get $3 million for him. This money could help resign Jack Wilson or Freddy Sanchez, it could go towards signing Scott Boras clients, or it could be used to improve the minor system already in place. The Althletics could get Brett Wallace at third, but then receive $5 million for the rest of Matt Holliday, only to turn around and send $3 million to the Dodgers for three prospects that the Dodgers are willing to part with.
And in the NBA, the trade amounts that must be relatively equal could be a thing of the past as teams pay not for expiring contracts, but for the chance to sign players now. The Knicks pay $35 million to the Cavs for the chance to sign LeBron now. Not to be outdone, the Nets also pony up the money, and a bidding war ensues. And the Bulls, desperate for a post presence, can agree with Utah to swap Boozer for Tyrus Thomas and $6 million which the Jazz put towards Milsap's contract.
This is not a sure thing. Teams in Europe make millions of dollars each year, but are still way over their heads in debt. And in the NBA and MLB, if we are to believe the reports, the money might not be there for the transfer system. But it would be pretty neat, though, wouldn't it?
Friday, July 24, 2009
July 24: Perfect Game
Mark Buehrle's career has been a dream come true. I mean, this guy was selected in the 38th round of the 1998 draft. Sandwiched between shortstop Shaun Skrehot and outfielder T.J. Bird, the White Sox found their future ace. But it gets even better.
Buerhle only made 36 minor league appearances before joining the Chicago White Sox in the middle of 2000. He pitched once out the pen before moving into the rotation, and anchor ever since. He has gone on to pitch a no-hitter (April 18, 2007), pitch a perfect game (July 23, 2009), and lead his team to a dominating World Series win in 2005. From a 38th round pick!
To me, Buehrle reminds me of Tom Glavine when he was around 30. Neither can zip it by, as both struggled to get it to 90 mph. But both had the proper mentality to make it work, hitting their spots, and making batters miss. As a matter of fact, Glavine and Buehrle have similar careers at this point. Glavine was 124-82 in 262 starts. Buehrle is 122-87 in 268 starts. Not a bad model...
And better yet, Glavine is a Hall of Fame candidate with 300+ wins under his belt. And he never threw a perfect game or a no-hitter! He did manage 2 Cy Youngs, which Buehrle is still waiting on. But I feel that Buehrle, if he can maintain his current order, is a Hall of Famer in the making.
Buerhle only made 36 minor league appearances before joining the Chicago White Sox in the middle of 2000. He pitched once out the pen before moving into the rotation, and anchor ever since. He has gone on to pitch a no-hitter (April 18, 2007), pitch a perfect game (July 23, 2009), and lead his team to a dominating World Series win in 2005. From a 38th round pick!
To me, Buehrle reminds me of Tom Glavine when he was around 30. Neither can zip it by, as both struggled to get it to 90 mph. But both had the proper mentality to make it work, hitting their spots, and making batters miss. As a matter of fact, Glavine and Buehrle have similar careers at this point. Glavine was 124-82 in 262 starts. Buehrle is 122-87 in 268 starts. Not a bad model...
And better yet, Glavine is a Hall of Fame candidate with 300+ wins under his belt. And he never threw a perfect game or a no-hitter! He did manage 2 Cy Youngs, which Buehrle is still waiting on. But I feel that Buehrle, if he can maintain his current order, is a Hall of Famer in the making.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
July 23: Rose-Colored Glasses
With the only story that piqued my interest involving the steroid user who shall not be named in Los Angeles, I decided to focus on the steroid debacle across sports to determine the reaction. I would compare it to someone that is considered a "dirty" player or a "bad guy" or "big mouth." These players get reputations that cause opposing fans to dislike and even hate them for what they do. For instance, I have always disliked Rasheed Wallace because he is a big mouth jerk that can't help but stick his foot in his mouth during a game, or shoving an opposing player, or getting in their face, etc. I even dislike people for doing the right thing. An example of this is David Eckstein, who always runs on the field, even when he walks. Come on! It was a walk! But I digress...
These players always hold this reputation, even when they change teams. Ron Artest was a bully in Indiana, and he became the same bully in Sacramento. Charles Barkley was a big mouth that talked a better game than he played at times in Phoenix and I couldn't help but smile when I saw him get torched on defense or his team lose. Both of these players were ones that fell into my dislike category.
And then they came to my Houston Rockets. Now I am a homer for Houston teams, and I make no bones about it. So when these "bad guys" showed up via trade, what was I to do? I was too young when Barkley arrived to understand the complete 180 I performed upon here he had arrived. I became the biggest Barkley supporter, ready for him to lead the team back to the Western Conference champs. With Artest, I realized I was switching sides, even as I tried my hardest to avoid it. I downgraded the trade, claiming it was a bad move for bad chemistry. He was a ball hog that wouldn't play the ball into Yao. Blah, blah, blah. Then I look up and can't be happier to see Artest in a Rockets uniform, wreaking the same havoc he did to the Rockets, to opposing teams. He was in their face, pushing around, and taunting them. And I ate it all up. Take that NBA!
I think this phenomenon is also what has saved some of the steroid blow back. Home fans could really care less if the guys plays well. For instance, Miguel Tejada was found to have lied about steroid use. Astros fans didn't give a damn, just as long as he played solid short and swung the bat well. A-Rod got into the fan's good graces when he played well. Now we see the reaction in Mannywood, where his pinch hitting appearance gets a bigger cheer than anything else in the evening (except when he hits a grand slam). Throughout the country, "steroid users" have been given the pass. And for the rest of the country, the story eventually runs dry, and other issues take over. The people that see him every day, that should remember the peril he placed his team in by missing 50 games, seem to have selective amnesia. This, my friend, is watching the sports world through rose-colored glasses.
These players always hold this reputation, even when they change teams. Ron Artest was a bully in Indiana, and he became the same bully in Sacramento. Charles Barkley was a big mouth that talked a better game than he played at times in Phoenix and I couldn't help but smile when I saw him get torched on defense or his team lose. Both of these players were ones that fell into my dislike category.
And then they came to my Houston Rockets. Now I am a homer for Houston teams, and I make no bones about it. So when these "bad guys" showed up via trade, what was I to do? I was too young when Barkley arrived to understand the complete 180 I performed upon here he had arrived. I became the biggest Barkley supporter, ready for him to lead the team back to the Western Conference champs. With Artest, I realized I was switching sides, even as I tried my hardest to avoid it. I downgraded the trade, claiming it was a bad move for bad chemistry. He was a ball hog that wouldn't play the ball into Yao. Blah, blah, blah. Then I look up and can't be happier to see Artest in a Rockets uniform, wreaking the same havoc he did to the Rockets, to opposing teams. He was in their face, pushing around, and taunting them. And I ate it all up. Take that NBA!
I think this phenomenon is also what has saved some of the steroid blow back. Home fans could really care less if the guys plays well. For instance, Miguel Tejada was found to have lied about steroid use. Astros fans didn't give a damn, just as long as he played solid short and swung the bat well. A-Rod got into the fan's good graces when he played well. Now we see the reaction in Mannywood, where his pinch hitting appearance gets a bigger cheer than anything else in the evening (except when he hits a grand slam). Throughout the country, "steroid users" have been given the pass. And for the rest of the country, the story eventually runs dry, and other issues take over. The people that see him every day, that should remember the peril he placed his team in by missing 50 games, seem to have selective amnesia. This, my friend, is watching the sports world through rose-colored glasses.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
July 22- Baseball Blinders
Today I am going to discuss what I refer to as baseball blinders. These prevent someone from seeing the big picture and let them get wrapped into a short-term focus. As an example, I will look at the Astros the last few years.
Since the Astros made it to the World Series in 2005, they have never had a team that could contend for a title. The pitching left when Pettite and Clemens left, only to be replaced by Jason Jennings and Randy Wolf. But the last two years, the team has made runs during the year to climb back into contention and miss out at the end. I don't know why, but this makes fans happy. Granted, at the time the winning is going on, everyone has that high. But they never make it, and if they did, it would be an embarrassing result in the opening round. Think if the team made it last year. Roy Oswalt followed by Wandy Rodriguez and Randy Wolf? Not a pretty thought...
And here the Astros are this year, making a "run" to the Central lead, only two games back from the Cardinals. And the prospects for a postseason bid this year would be even bleaker. Oswalt, Rodriguez, and Hampton? Ouch. But after winning last night, the fans are already hopping on the bandwagon. Now, I am not going to dispute that it is nice to have a solid team in town. But is it enough for everyone just to scrape into the playoffs and get hammered? Personally, I think just getting there is not enough. Ask Rockets fans if it is enough when they were first round flameouts for years.
Now, I don't think this team is terrible (like the Nationals), but they are not the Dodgers or Phillies. Hell, they aren't even the Brewers, Cardinals, or Cubs. Therefore, they should start thinking about next year. The GM should have foresight and start rebuilding a terrible farm system. Tejada is an asset this year, and should be moved for prospects. Let Edwin Maysonet show what he can do at SS. Blum or Erstad could shore up a contenders bench. And we have the chance to get some decent prospects. In the long run, I think it should be title contender or regroup. This year, the Astros are not title contenders. Therefore, they should be in rebuild mode and get ready for a 2010 campaign.
Since the Astros made it to the World Series in 2005, they have never had a team that could contend for a title. The pitching left when Pettite and Clemens left, only to be replaced by Jason Jennings and Randy Wolf. But the last two years, the team has made runs during the year to climb back into contention and miss out at the end. I don't know why, but this makes fans happy. Granted, at the time the winning is going on, everyone has that high. But they never make it, and if they did, it would be an embarrassing result in the opening round. Think if the team made it last year. Roy Oswalt followed by Wandy Rodriguez and Randy Wolf? Not a pretty thought...
And here the Astros are this year, making a "run" to the Central lead, only two games back from the Cardinals. And the prospects for a postseason bid this year would be even bleaker. Oswalt, Rodriguez, and Hampton? Ouch. But after winning last night, the fans are already hopping on the bandwagon. Now, I am not going to dispute that it is nice to have a solid team in town. But is it enough for everyone just to scrape into the playoffs and get hammered? Personally, I think just getting there is not enough. Ask Rockets fans if it is enough when they were first round flameouts for years.
Now, I don't think this team is terrible (like the Nationals), but they are not the Dodgers or Phillies. Hell, they aren't even the Brewers, Cardinals, or Cubs. Therefore, they should start thinking about next year. The GM should have foresight and start rebuilding a terrible farm system. Tejada is an asset this year, and should be moved for prospects. Let Edwin Maysonet show what he can do at SS. Blum or Erstad could shore up a contenders bench. And we have the chance to get some decent prospects. In the long run, I think it should be title contender or regroup. This year, the Astros are not title contenders. Therefore, they should be in rebuild mode and get ready for a 2010 campaign.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
July 21: Lamar Odom and Replay in Baseball
One of the big news items from yesterday is the destination of free agent Lamar Odom. He is being openly courted in Miami by Dwyane Wade for a triumphant return. The Miami offer is a pretty robust one, but not in the $8-$10 million that I think Odom felt he could get. But his other option, a return to LA, is resulting in no news from the club. Odom even spoke with owner Jerry Buss to no avail.
Odom's best bet, for an immediate career move that will net him more opportunities for more rings, is to resign in LA and rejoin Kobe and Pau Gasol with newly-signed Ron Artest to form a very good core for a repeat run. In the long run, though, a signing of Odom could signify an intent by the Heat to retain Wade. Toss in the fact that Carlos Boozer has tabbed Miami as his top destination, the Heat could have a Celtics-like return to the top by adding two stars, Odom and Boozer (Garnett and Allen), to the already established one, Wade (Pierce). The Heat would join the talk with Boston, Cleveland, and Orlando and might even move to the front of the class.
All that said, I think that the longer the Heat's offer sits on the table, the more likely Odom goes to LA. He is obviously not signing it for a reason, and it isn't to get more money from Miami. It is all they can offer. He is waiting to see what the Lakers throw his way. His resigning will lock the Lakers in as preseason favorites by a mile to repeat for the title.
The other big item was the comeback and exciting finish in Oakland between the Twins and Athletics. The Athletics came back from being down 1o runs in the 3rd inning to win the game 14-13. The final out came on a tag by pitcher Michael Wuertz on a sliding Michael Cuddyer at the plate following a wild pitch. The call was out, but replay showed the umpire had a terrible angle on the play and that Cuddyer slid in safe before the tag was applied.
MLB has implemented instant replay for close calls on the warning track to determine if it was a home run or fan interference. This was brought on by a rash of calls that went the wrong way early last season. But critics of the replay said that it was only the beginning, and that the league would begin to implement it in more and more situations. They were right.
I think it is time for the league to increase the usage of replay to include close plays at the bags. While human error has always been "part of the game," the technology that has developed has helped let the actual players decide the outcome in basketball (last second shots) and football (coach challenges). There is no reason that the same mindset can't allow baseball to move in the same direction. An extra official at each game designated to review close plays should be simple enough to put in place. Even if it is a handheld device for the head umpire, as was discussed in launching the home run replay, would suffice. It would be quick without much delay. Did the foot hit the bag first or the ball in the glove? Slow motion and frame by frame can makes it easy to determine.
No more are we left screaming at an umpire that won't change his mind as Ron Gardenhire and Michael Cuddyer were left doing Monday night. Close plays can be corrected quickly and efficiently, allowing the game to continue as it should. But what if it is too close to make a determination? Baseball minds already had this in mind way back when: tie goes to the runner!
Odom's best bet, for an immediate career move that will net him more opportunities for more rings, is to resign in LA and rejoin Kobe and Pau Gasol with newly-signed Ron Artest to form a very good core for a repeat run. In the long run, though, a signing of Odom could signify an intent by the Heat to retain Wade. Toss in the fact that Carlos Boozer has tabbed Miami as his top destination, the Heat could have a Celtics-like return to the top by adding two stars, Odom and Boozer (Garnett and Allen), to the already established one, Wade (Pierce). The Heat would join the talk with Boston, Cleveland, and Orlando and might even move to the front of the class.
All that said, I think that the longer the Heat's offer sits on the table, the more likely Odom goes to LA. He is obviously not signing it for a reason, and it isn't to get more money from Miami. It is all they can offer. He is waiting to see what the Lakers throw his way. His resigning will lock the Lakers in as preseason favorites by a mile to repeat for the title.
The other big item was the comeback and exciting finish in Oakland between the Twins and Athletics. The Athletics came back from being down 1o runs in the 3rd inning to win the game 14-13. The final out came on a tag by pitcher Michael Wuertz on a sliding Michael Cuddyer at the plate following a wild pitch. The call was out, but replay showed the umpire had a terrible angle on the play and that Cuddyer slid in safe before the tag was applied.
MLB has implemented instant replay for close calls on the warning track to determine if it was a home run or fan interference. This was brought on by a rash of calls that went the wrong way early last season. But critics of the replay said that it was only the beginning, and that the league would begin to implement it in more and more situations. They were right.
I think it is time for the league to increase the usage of replay to include close plays at the bags. While human error has always been "part of the game," the technology that has developed has helped let the actual players decide the outcome in basketball (last second shots) and football (coach challenges). There is no reason that the same mindset can't allow baseball to move in the same direction. An extra official at each game designated to review close plays should be simple enough to put in place. Even if it is a handheld device for the head umpire, as was discussed in launching the home run replay, would suffice. It would be quick without much delay. Did the foot hit the bag first or the ball in the glove? Slow motion and frame by frame can makes it easy to determine.
No more are we left screaming at an umpire that won't change his mind as Ron Gardenhire and Michael Cuddyer were left doing Monday night. Close plays can be corrected quickly and efficiently, allowing the game to continue as it should. But what if it is too close to make a determination? Baseball minds already had this in mind way back when: tie goes to the runner!
Monday, July 20, 2009
July 20: Tom Watson and Summer Baseball
So I expected Tom Watson to have four or five holes that derailed his run. I just didn't expect it to be 18 and the four playoff holes to follow. It was sad watching it on TV because everyone there except for Mrs. Cink was rooting for Watson, and he caved in like no other. What is it about the British Open that destroys people? Van de Velde and Mickelson have both felt the heartache that Watson will no doubt feel for the near future. While he had 5 Open wins already, this is one that got away.
Also, is anyone else tiring of baseball? I always say it won't be me, but it happens. They call it the dog days of summer for a reason. Teams are close enough that you are still in contention, but so much baseball is to be played that it is hard to get into every game. I have been watching the Astros, streaking as of late, and they look like they might make a miracle run again this season. Drayton has to understand how much better this team might be with another arm in the rotation. Perhaps he will see the light and trade Tejada before the break. Because, facing the facts, even if this team makes a run, they have much less firepower than Milwauke and Chicago and maybe even St. Louis. Food for thought...
Finally, it is getting close to football season, both NFL and college. Nothing is better than a full Saturday slate of college games followed by a full Sunday. I can't wait.
Also, is anyone else tiring of baseball? I always say it won't be me, but it happens. They call it the dog days of summer for a reason. Teams are close enough that you are still in contention, but so much baseball is to be played that it is hard to get into every game. I have been watching the Astros, streaking as of late, and they look like they might make a miracle run again this season. Drayton has to understand how much better this team might be with another arm in the rotation. Perhaps he will see the light and trade Tejada before the break. Because, facing the facts, even if this team makes a run, they have much less firepower than Milwauke and Chicago and maybe even St. Louis. Food for thought...
Finally, it is getting close to football season, both NFL and college. Nothing is better than a full Saturday slate of college games followed by a full Sunday. I can't wait.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Midseason Awards
NL MVP: Albert Pujols, Cardinals
This one is a no-brainer for me, especially looking at how the Cardinals, a team suspected of struggling in the division, are leading the Brewers and Cubs in a tight division race. He set a personal best for homers before the break (32), and leads the NL in homers, RBIs (87) and is fourth in average (.332). Not bad for a guy that teams avoid like the Plague when pitching.
NL Cy Young: Tim Lincecum, Giants
He is following his first Cy Young campaign with an equally amazing one. This time, though, the team is following. Last year, he won on a team that struggled to do much of anything. This year, the resurgent Giants are scoring runs and helping the pitching. Not that Lincecum needs it. His 10 wins and 2.33 ERA are second in the NL in both categories, and he leads the league with 149 strikeouts. This kid is the real deal, and he has the Giants in contention for the playoffs.
NL Manager of the Year: Jim Tracy, Rockies
This was a close one between Tracy and Joe Torre, but Tracy has done more with less since an 18-28 start by the team. Since then, the team is 29-13, getting back to within two games of the wild card leading Giants. He has pushed the right buttons and turned players that were considered declining into stars again. Jason Marquis, an offseason acquisition from the Cubs, leads the NL with 11 wins. Todd Helton, the career Rockie, is hitting .319 with 10 homers and 57 RBIs. And all this after trading away All-Stars Matt Holliday and Brian Fuentes. Not too shabby...
NL Surprise: San Francisco Giants
The Giants are coming off a 72-90 campaign with there eyes on a rebuilding process. Instead, they made some shrewd moves and find themselves leading the wild card in the NL. The team had some veteran presence in Aaron Rowand and Bengie Molina, but added Edgar Renteria and Randy Johnson to the mix. Both have led the resurgence, aided by Pablo Sandoval, Travis Ishikawa, and other younger players. The pitching, a strength in the preseason, has held serve, with Lincecum, Matt Cain, Johnson, and others pitching lights out. The offense, the big question mark, has been inspired. This team is no mirage, but no one expected these results.
NL Bust: Chicago Cubs
In a toss up with the Mets, the Cubs win because of the promise they showed last year before falling flat. They sent off productive players (such as Jason Marquis), only to land players that have been more headache than help. Milton Bradley has not provided the lefty power they craved. Moreover, no player is hitting over .300, with Ryan Theriot leading those with enough at bats with a .299 average. Injuries have been an issue, and the team has struggled to score runs with the pitching allowing only 353, third in the NL. Unless that stagnant offense finds a spark, it will only continue the countdown of The Curse.
AL MVP: Derek Jeter, Yankees
While the season started slow in New York, everyone panicked that the big new signings where more bust and not boom. In the tumult, fingers were waving all around the room, at Mark Texeira, AJ Burnett, CC Sabathia, and the poster child for steroids, Alex Rodriguez. But none fell on The Captain, and he plodded through, providing good defense to go with a solid bat. He is hitting .321, has 10 homer, and stolen 17 bases. More than that, he was able to keep everyone on track and help carry the team early, giving them the chance to shoot out and grab the AL wild card at the break. He helped Joe Girardi get out of the hot seat in two weeks and should help end the playoff drought soon enough.
AL Cy Young: Zack Greinke, Royals
Some thinking a winning team is a component, but I disagree. This kid was lights out early on, and has remained so after a short three start bump. He leads the AL in ERA (2.12), is second in wins (10), and third in strikeouts (129), all for a team 14 games under .500. He has won more than a quarter of the teams games, and must pitch brilliantly to get those numbers. His season is similar to Lincecum's year last season, and he shows no signs of letting up.
AL Manager of the Year: Don Wakamatsu
This was another close one, but he has turned a team that was terrible last year into one that is in the wild card hunt in the strong AL. The team was turned over in the offseason, seeing Raul Ibanez, JJ Putz, and Jeremy Reed leave via free agency or trade. The team rebuilt, mixing veterans with prospects, including Ken Griffey Jr. and Russell Branyan. After getting the pieces in place, Wakamatsu made them all work in unison. Similar to Tracy, he has pushed the right buttons to get this team to start winning again.
AL Surprise: Texas Rangers pitching
Every year, the Rangers score lots of runs. And every year, they give up just as many. But this year, the pitching has been as advertised, and the team is showing that it can compete. Kevin Millwood bought into the mantra to pitch to contact and pitch for innings. He leads the AL in innings pitched, and has let one of the best defenses in the league cover his back. Adding Elvis Andrus to short, allowing an already adequate shortstop-turned-third baseman Mike Young to shift over. Add in a solid outfield corps, and this staff was ready. It doesn't hurt to get good performances from players no one had heard of (Scott Feldman [8-2, 3.73 ERA]) or thought were long gone (Vincente Padilla [7-4, 4.53 ERA]). With the hitting continuing to mash, and the pitchers knowing how to throw it, the Rangers are looking like contenders for the September push.
AL Bust: Cleveland Indians
Narrowly edging out Oakland, which landed one of the best hitters available only to beat the Indians in the AL, the Indians have taken it on the chin this year. Reigning AL Cy Young award winner Cliff Lee started out looking like a AAA pitcher, and the scrap heap provided there only other starter (Carl Pavano). Meanwhile, offensive stalwarts Travis Hafner (injured), Grady Sizemore (.238), and Jhonny Peralta (.257) have not been able to get the offense going. The team. readying for a breakout performance following a supposed lull last year, might be looking to bust this apart and start again sooner rather than later.
This one is a no-brainer for me, especially looking at how the Cardinals, a team suspected of struggling in the division, are leading the Brewers and Cubs in a tight division race. He set a personal best for homers before the break (32), and leads the NL in homers, RBIs (87) and is fourth in average (.332). Not bad for a guy that teams avoid like the Plague when pitching.
NL Cy Young: Tim Lincecum, Giants
He is following his first Cy Young campaign with an equally amazing one. This time, though, the team is following. Last year, he won on a team that struggled to do much of anything. This year, the resurgent Giants are scoring runs and helping the pitching. Not that Lincecum needs it. His 10 wins and 2.33 ERA are second in the NL in both categories, and he leads the league with 149 strikeouts. This kid is the real deal, and he has the Giants in contention for the playoffs.
NL Manager of the Year: Jim Tracy, Rockies
This was a close one between Tracy and Joe Torre, but Tracy has done more with less since an 18-28 start by the team. Since then, the team is 29-13, getting back to within two games of the wild card leading Giants. He has pushed the right buttons and turned players that were considered declining into stars again. Jason Marquis, an offseason acquisition from the Cubs, leads the NL with 11 wins. Todd Helton, the career Rockie, is hitting .319 with 10 homers and 57 RBIs. And all this after trading away All-Stars Matt Holliday and Brian Fuentes. Not too shabby...
NL Surprise: San Francisco Giants
The Giants are coming off a 72-90 campaign with there eyes on a rebuilding process. Instead, they made some shrewd moves and find themselves leading the wild card in the NL. The team had some veteran presence in Aaron Rowand and Bengie Molina, but added Edgar Renteria and Randy Johnson to the mix. Both have led the resurgence, aided by Pablo Sandoval, Travis Ishikawa, and other younger players. The pitching, a strength in the preseason, has held serve, with Lincecum, Matt Cain, Johnson, and others pitching lights out. The offense, the big question mark, has been inspired. This team is no mirage, but no one expected these results.
NL Bust: Chicago Cubs
In a toss up with the Mets, the Cubs win because of the promise they showed last year before falling flat. They sent off productive players (such as Jason Marquis), only to land players that have been more headache than help. Milton Bradley has not provided the lefty power they craved. Moreover, no player is hitting over .300, with Ryan Theriot leading those with enough at bats with a .299 average. Injuries have been an issue, and the team has struggled to score runs with the pitching allowing only 353, third in the NL. Unless that stagnant offense finds a spark, it will only continue the countdown of The Curse.
AL MVP: Derek Jeter, Yankees
While the season started slow in New York, everyone panicked that the big new signings where more bust and not boom. In the tumult, fingers were waving all around the room, at Mark Texeira, AJ Burnett, CC Sabathia, and the poster child for steroids, Alex Rodriguez. But none fell on The Captain, and he plodded through, providing good defense to go with a solid bat. He is hitting .321, has 10 homer, and stolen 17 bases. More than that, he was able to keep everyone on track and help carry the team early, giving them the chance to shoot out and grab the AL wild card at the break. He helped Joe Girardi get out of the hot seat in two weeks and should help end the playoff drought soon enough.
AL Cy Young: Zack Greinke, Royals
Some thinking a winning team is a component, but I disagree. This kid was lights out early on, and has remained so after a short three start bump. He leads the AL in ERA (2.12), is second in wins (10), and third in strikeouts (129), all for a team 14 games under .500. He has won more than a quarter of the teams games, and must pitch brilliantly to get those numbers. His season is similar to Lincecum's year last season, and he shows no signs of letting up.
AL Manager of the Year: Don Wakamatsu
This was another close one, but he has turned a team that was terrible last year into one that is in the wild card hunt in the strong AL. The team was turned over in the offseason, seeing Raul Ibanez, JJ Putz, and Jeremy Reed leave via free agency or trade. The team rebuilt, mixing veterans with prospects, including Ken Griffey Jr. and Russell Branyan. After getting the pieces in place, Wakamatsu made them all work in unison. Similar to Tracy, he has pushed the right buttons to get this team to start winning again.
AL Surprise: Texas Rangers pitching
Every year, the Rangers score lots of runs. And every year, they give up just as many. But this year, the pitching has been as advertised, and the team is showing that it can compete. Kevin Millwood bought into the mantra to pitch to contact and pitch for innings. He leads the AL in innings pitched, and has let one of the best defenses in the league cover his back. Adding Elvis Andrus to short, allowing an already adequate shortstop-turned-third baseman Mike Young to shift over. Add in a solid outfield corps, and this staff was ready. It doesn't hurt to get good performances from players no one had heard of (Scott Feldman [8-2, 3.73 ERA]) or thought were long gone (Vincente Padilla [7-4, 4.53 ERA]). With the hitting continuing to mash, and the pitchers knowing how to throw it, the Rangers are looking like contenders for the September push.
AL Bust: Cleveland Indians
Narrowly edging out Oakland, which landed one of the best hitters available only to beat the Indians in the AL, the Indians have taken it on the chin this year. Reigning AL Cy Young award winner Cliff Lee started out looking like a AAA pitcher, and the scrap heap provided there only other starter (Carl Pavano). Meanwhile, offensive stalwarts Travis Hafner (injured), Grady Sizemore (.238), and Jhonny Peralta (.257) have not been able to get the offense going. The team. readying for a breakout performance following a supposed lull last year, might be looking to bust this apart and start again sooner rather than later.
July 16
To try to get to a daily routine, I am going to post stuff about that day or day before, and then have special posts every now and then.
Yesterday might be the most boring sports day in the summer, as baseball is on hiatus. But we have the All-Star game recap to think about plus other "fringe" sports. The Game was great. It was fast and fairly exciting. Some great catches (Werth and Crawford) and some decent pitching saw the AL win for the 13th freaking time in a row! Really!?! It just shows that the DH has turned the AL into an offensive juggernaut. I know those were position players, but the DH makes it a more offense-driven league. This is starting to look like the Western Conference versus the Eastern Conference from top to bottom. Top can compete (Dodgers, Rockies, etc.) but the bottom is way away. Perhaps it will swing in time, but for now, I predict an AL lock on home field in the World Series.
Also, the British Open started way too early this morning to be considered today, so I'll count it. Tom Watson (yes, that Tom Watson) is a shot back and contending for his 6th British Open. The man is on the Senior Tour, and showed those boys a thing or two. Just goes to show, at the British, where the rough is really rough and the winds are always killer, low ball hitters that don't make mistakes are golden. He played today to avoid mistakes and make birdies where he could. That is the key. But all that said, Watson likes to collapse in a string of holes somewhere over the four days. I expect nothing less this time too.
Finally, Jeremy Mayfield tested positive again for a banned substance. Now, I am a Nascar fan. But obviously this guy is giving the smarter drivers a bad name. Catch me once, shame on me. Catch me twice, I am a blithering idiot. See you later, Jeremy. Next time, call Manny Ramirez to get advice on how to handle the situation. The fans still love him, even if he cheated the game and his team. Now Mayfield will have the scarlet letter on him throughout the rest of his career, which I think is officially over. No team without a driver or sponsor, which is what he will have sooner rather than later now.
Yesterday might be the most boring sports day in the summer, as baseball is on hiatus. But we have the All-Star game recap to think about plus other "fringe" sports. The Game was great. It was fast and fairly exciting. Some great catches (Werth and Crawford) and some decent pitching saw the AL win for the 13th freaking time in a row! Really!?! It just shows that the DH has turned the AL into an offensive juggernaut. I know those were position players, but the DH makes it a more offense-driven league. This is starting to look like the Western Conference versus the Eastern Conference from top to bottom. Top can compete (Dodgers, Rockies, etc.) but the bottom is way away. Perhaps it will swing in time, but for now, I predict an AL lock on home field in the World Series.
Also, the British Open started way too early this morning to be considered today, so I'll count it. Tom Watson (yes, that Tom Watson) is a shot back and contending for his 6th British Open. The man is on the Senior Tour, and showed those boys a thing or two. Just goes to show, at the British, where the rough is really rough and the winds are always killer, low ball hitters that don't make mistakes are golden. He played today to avoid mistakes and make birdies where he could. That is the key. But all that said, Watson likes to collapse in a string of holes somewhere over the four days. I expect nothing less this time too.
Finally, Jeremy Mayfield tested positive again for a banned substance. Now, I am a Nascar fan. But obviously this guy is giving the smarter drivers a bad name. Catch me once, shame on me. Catch me twice, I am a blithering idiot. See you later, Jeremy. Next time, call Manny Ramirez to get advice on how to handle the situation. The fans still love him, even if he cheated the game and his team. Now Mayfield will have the scarlet letter on him throughout the rest of his career, which I think is officially over. No team without a driver or sponsor, which is what he will have sooner rather than later now.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Eastern Conference Grades
Toronto Raptors: A (9- DeMar DeRozan)
I usually don't like the one player draft, but I can make an exception. This pick was fabulous! The team has a good lineup already (Bosh, Bargnani, Calderon) but needed a flashy scorer to fill it out. Enter DeRozan. He is not polished yet, and needs some time to reach his potential. But watch out when he does. He has the chance to be a great playmaker from a combo spot in the NBA.
Atlanta Hawks: A- (19- Jeff Teague [PG], 49- Sergiy Gladyr [SG])
The Mike Bibby era is over, but there are ample replacements now. Jamal Crawford will get his chance to finally play in the playoffs, but Jeff Teague was a guard that I thought was as good, if not better than, Rubio, Flynn, or Jennings. He has amazing quickness, and you can barely keep him out of the paint. Watch for floating alley-oops to Josh Smith in the near future. Team his slashing with Smiths and Joe Johnson's shooting, and this is a tough team. Gladyr is a project, but looks to be a good Euro prospect. Give him a few years and he should be on the bench in Atlanta.
Philadelphia 76ers: A- (17- Jrue Holiday [PG])
Another one pick draft that I love. Holiday had fallen because of some shoulder injury concerns, which keeps this out of an A grade. But, like Danny Grainger some time back, he goes 17th and is ready to show the world he can make it. The 76ers could not have been happier how this played out. Andre Miller is no longer a huge priority, and the 76ers have a PG to team with Iguodala and Brand to make a run this year, and the PG for the future too.
Charlotte Bobcats: B+ (12- Gerald Henderson [SG], 40- Derrick Brown [PF])
This was a good draft from a team that has been missing that for some time. Henderson gets to watch his clone, Raja Bell, and learn how to make it in the NBA as a slashing defender with not a lot of shooting ability. That said, there are a lot of worse things to become (like Adam Morrison). And Brown has a big future, assuming he develops into the player he can be. As a future grab, he bumps the score up because of his ability to contribute now.
Detroit Pistons: B+ (15- Austin Daye [SF], 35- DaJuan Summers [SF], 39- Jonas Jerebko [SF])
Three wings would usually warrant a lower grade, but these are three different styles. Daye is a 6'11" three point specialist that will back up Tayshaun Prince but needs to add bulk to move to PF. Summers, considered at the 15th pick, is a bigger player with a developed game that could play PF in a pinch. Jerebko is an asset, left in Europe to develop into a trade piece later or a contributor. Three players that play the same position that contribute in completely different ways.
New Jersey Nets: B+ (11- Terrence Williams [SG])
Despite one pick, I think the Nets did a lot to help the future of the team. After moving Vince Carter, this team had a lot of questions with no true direction. Devin Harris, Courtney Lee, and Brook Lopez will be fixtures, and now Williams should join that group. A top 5 athlete, he is tall for a guard (6'6") and can flat out jump. Look for him to become a terror on defenses because he is too big for a SG and too fast for a SF or PF.
Cleveland Cavaliers: B (30- Christian Eyenga [SF], 46- Danny Green [SF], 57- Emir Preldzic [SF])
The Cavs turned an average drafty one notch higher by getting Danny Green so far down. Green is the kind of player that can help the Cavs now, as opposed to the other two. Both Eyenga and Preldzic need two or three years of international seasoning. But Green is a solid passer and shooter, and can be a great rotation guy for the Cavs. To find that in the middle of the second round is a good thing. There score would have been lower after having taken Eyenga when DeJuan Blair and Sam Young, both immediate contributors, were on the board.
Indiana Pacers: B (13- Tyler Hansborough [PF], 52- A.J. Price [PG])
This is the definition of a draft designed to build a team that can compete in the diluted Eastern Conference. Needing to get a physical presence, the Pacers grabbed Hansborough, perhaps the player with the best projected game in the draft. Not a star, he will be a workhorse in the paint. I think of Jeff Foster with an offensive game. Next, they wanted a point early, but grabbing Price in the second round is insurance. He can be a solid backup point guard, but won't wow anyone. He can be a good third guard option to season to replace Jarrett Jack, assuming he re-signs.
Miami Heat: B- (42- Patrick Beverly [PG], 60- Robert Dozier [SF])
The Heat arrived without a first round pick (thanks Pat Riley; was Ricky Davis worth it). But they had their eye on Beverly, an interesting player that played in Ukraine last year after leaving school. Now he is going to come in as a rotation player, being a solid option off the bench for a team of playmakers. Dozier has the talent to be one of those playmakers, but has never lived up to it. He'll have a shot, not in the NBA, but somewhere, to show he has the tools to match his talent.
Milwaukee Bucks: B- (10- Brandon Jennings, 41- Jodie Meeks [SG])
I give the Bucks credit for standing tough and getting the guy they wanted in their slot. But I think Jennings will be a huge disappointment in the league. A guy that can't get into college has the intelligence to manage the game in the NBA? I don't know. If he does manage to make it, he could be the best in the draft. Meeks is a big-time scorer that lacks athleticism. I question his ability to create his own shot, which on the Bucks, a player must do without a slashing type player now that Richard Jefferson is gone.
New York Knicks: B- (8- Jordan Hill [PF], 29- Toney Douglas [SG])
The Knicks went into the draft hoping and praying to get Stephen Curry. When he left the board right before them, it became apparent that Hill was their only choice. Don't get me wrong; I think Hill will be a terrific contributor in the NBA. But they desperately needed a passing point, and saw Rubio, Flynn, and Curry leave all three picks in front of them. Now the Knicks are stacked in the post (Hill, David Lee, Milicic) with still no guard options. This might indicate that the team is leaning towards moving David Lee to clear payroll for a run at LeBron.
Boston Celtics: C+ (58- Lester Hudson [SG])
The Celtics get slightly below average because the player is a long shot from coming through. But what can you expect from the second to last pick in the draft. Hudson is out of Tennessee-Martin, a tiny school, and has had no real competition. He can flat out ball, but he is also old (24). He might be a replacement for Eddie House down the road, but he has a lot of developing to do, something that is hard for a 24 year old.
Chicago Bulls: C+ (16- James Johnson [PF], 26- Taj Gibson [PF])
The Bulls signaled their intention to place Tyrus Thomas on the trading block by picking Johnson. He is almost the same player, with the ability to guard a SF or PF. He is still a work in process, but has moments of brilliance, much like Thomas. I think he is the replacement for him, which may even be this season. But how many lanky post players can one team have? Never too many, according to the Bulls, who added to the glut with Gibson. A project player, I think they already had enough of the. A low post scorer or replacement for a most-likely-departing Ben Gordon would have been better.
Orlando Magic: INC (no picks)
The Magic went in without a pick and left without a pick. The team is pretty content after making the Finals, losing Turkoglu and Lee in the offseason. Turkoglu was a huge blow, but Vince Carter should help ease their pain. Look for them to move Rafer Alston at some point to get another wing defender to pair with Rashard Lewis.
Washington Wizards: INC (no picks)
Unlike the Magic, the Wizards went in with a pick but traded it to Houston for cash. This is a decent move, considering they moved the 5th overall pick for two solid veterans (Mike Miller and Randy Foye). With them in the fold, the Wizards become a viable team again, with Miller adding shooting to Arenas slashing, and Foye manning the point if Arenas needs to move over. Teamed with Jamison, this team looks like a playoff team in the East.
I usually don't like the one player draft, but I can make an exception. This pick was fabulous! The team has a good lineup already (Bosh, Bargnani, Calderon) but needed a flashy scorer to fill it out. Enter DeRozan. He is not polished yet, and needs some time to reach his potential. But watch out when he does. He has the chance to be a great playmaker from a combo spot in the NBA.
Atlanta Hawks: A- (19- Jeff Teague [PG], 49- Sergiy Gladyr [SG])
The Mike Bibby era is over, but there are ample replacements now. Jamal Crawford will get his chance to finally play in the playoffs, but Jeff Teague was a guard that I thought was as good, if not better than, Rubio, Flynn, or Jennings. He has amazing quickness, and you can barely keep him out of the paint. Watch for floating alley-oops to Josh Smith in the near future. Team his slashing with Smiths and Joe Johnson's shooting, and this is a tough team. Gladyr is a project, but looks to be a good Euro prospect. Give him a few years and he should be on the bench in Atlanta.
Philadelphia 76ers: A- (17- Jrue Holiday [PG])
Another one pick draft that I love. Holiday had fallen because of some shoulder injury concerns, which keeps this out of an A grade. But, like Danny Grainger some time back, he goes 17th and is ready to show the world he can make it. The 76ers could not have been happier how this played out. Andre Miller is no longer a huge priority, and the 76ers have a PG to team with Iguodala and Brand to make a run this year, and the PG for the future too.
Charlotte Bobcats: B+ (12- Gerald Henderson [SG], 40- Derrick Brown [PF])
This was a good draft from a team that has been missing that for some time. Henderson gets to watch his clone, Raja Bell, and learn how to make it in the NBA as a slashing defender with not a lot of shooting ability. That said, there are a lot of worse things to become (like Adam Morrison). And Brown has a big future, assuming he develops into the player he can be. As a future grab, he bumps the score up because of his ability to contribute now.
Detroit Pistons: B+ (15- Austin Daye [SF], 35- DaJuan Summers [SF], 39- Jonas Jerebko [SF])
Three wings would usually warrant a lower grade, but these are three different styles. Daye is a 6'11" three point specialist that will back up Tayshaun Prince but needs to add bulk to move to PF. Summers, considered at the 15th pick, is a bigger player with a developed game that could play PF in a pinch. Jerebko is an asset, left in Europe to develop into a trade piece later or a contributor. Three players that play the same position that contribute in completely different ways.
New Jersey Nets: B+ (11- Terrence Williams [SG])
Despite one pick, I think the Nets did a lot to help the future of the team. After moving Vince Carter, this team had a lot of questions with no true direction. Devin Harris, Courtney Lee, and Brook Lopez will be fixtures, and now Williams should join that group. A top 5 athlete, he is tall for a guard (6'6") and can flat out jump. Look for him to become a terror on defenses because he is too big for a SG and too fast for a SF or PF.
Cleveland Cavaliers: B (30- Christian Eyenga [SF], 46- Danny Green [SF], 57- Emir Preldzic [SF])
The Cavs turned an average drafty one notch higher by getting Danny Green so far down. Green is the kind of player that can help the Cavs now, as opposed to the other two. Both Eyenga and Preldzic need two or three years of international seasoning. But Green is a solid passer and shooter, and can be a great rotation guy for the Cavs. To find that in the middle of the second round is a good thing. There score would have been lower after having taken Eyenga when DeJuan Blair and Sam Young, both immediate contributors, were on the board.
Indiana Pacers: B (13- Tyler Hansborough [PF], 52- A.J. Price [PG])
This is the definition of a draft designed to build a team that can compete in the diluted Eastern Conference. Needing to get a physical presence, the Pacers grabbed Hansborough, perhaps the player with the best projected game in the draft. Not a star, he will be a workhorse in the paint. I think of Jeff Foster with an offensive game. Next, they wanted a point early, but grabbing Price in the second round is insurance. He can be a solid backup point guard, but won't wow anyone. He can be a good third guard option to season to replace Jarrett Jack, assuming he re-signs.
Miami Heat: B- (42- Patrick Beverly [PG], 60- Robert Dozier [SF])
The Heat arrived without a first round pick (thanks Pat Riley; was Ricky Davis worth it). But they had their eye on Beverly, an interesting player that played in Ukraine last year after leaving school. Now he is going to come in as a rotation player, being a solid option off the bench for a team of playmakers. Dozier has the talent to be one of those playmakers, but has never lived up to it. He'll have a shot, not in the NBA, but somewhere, to show he has the tools to match his talent.
Milwaukee Bucks: B- (10- Brandon Jennings, 41- Jodie Meeks [SG])
I give the Bucks credit for standing tough and getting the guy they wanted in their slot. But I think Jennings will be a huge disappointment in the league. A guy that can't get into college has the intelligence to manage the game in the NBA? I don't know. If he does manage to make it, he could be the best in the draft. Meeks is a big-time scorer that lacks athleticism. I question his ability to create his own shot, which on the Bucks, a player must do without a slashing type player now that Richard Jefferson is gone.
New York Knicks: B- (8- Jordan Hill [PF], 29- Toney Douglas [SG])
The Knicks went into the draft hoping and praying to get Stephen Curry. When he left the board right before them, it became apparent that Hill was their only choice. Don't get me wrong; I think Hill will be a terrific contributor in the NBA. But they desperately needed a passing point, and saw Rubio, Flynn, and Curry leave all three picks in front of them. Now the Knicks are stacked in the post (Hill, David Lee, Milicic) with still no guard options. This might indicate that the team is leaning towards moving David Lee to clear payroll for a run at LeBron.
Boston Celtics: C+ (58- Lester Hudson [SG])
The Celtics get slightly below average because the player is a long shot from coming through. But what can you expect from the second to last pick in the draft. Hudson is out of Tennessee-Martin, a tiny school, and has had no real competition. He can flat out ball, but he is also old (24). He might be a replacement for Eddie House down the road, but he has a lot of developing to do, something that is hard for a 24 year old.
Chicago Bulls: C+ (16- James Johnson [PF], 26- Taj Gibson [PF])
The Bulls signaled their intention to place Tyrus Thomas on the trading block by picking Johnson. He is almost the same player, with the ability to guard a SF or PF. He is still a work in process, but has moments of brilliance, much like Thomas. I think he is the replacement for him, which may even be this season. But how many lanky post players can one team have? Never too many, according to the Bulls, who added to the glut with Gibson. A project player, I think they already had enough of the. A low post scorer or replacement for a most-likely-departing Ben Gordon would have been better.
Orlando Magic: INC (no picks)
The Magic went in without a pick and left without a pick. The team is pretty content after making the Finals, losing Turkoglu and Lee in the offseason. Turkoglu was a huge blow, but Vince Carter should help ease their pain. Look for them to move Rafer Alston at some point to get another wing defender to pair with Rashard Lewis.
Washington Wizards: INC (no picks)
Unlike the Magic, the Wizards went in with a pick but traded it to Houston for cash. This is a decent move, considering they moved the 5th overall pick for two solid veterans (Mike Miller and Randy Foye). With them in the fold, the Wizards become a viable team again, with Miller adding shooting to Arenas slashing, and Foye manning the point if Arenas needs to move over. Teamed with Jamison, this team looks like a playoff team in the East.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)